We all know that Firefox is not perfect and that it is not a panecea against exploits, but if there are currently just as many exploits against Firefox as there are against IE I wish this author had both quantified and qualified it. What I read here was not a careful analysis, but a Op-ed piece.
As some of the comments on the article state, when he said Firefox's Mozilla the author lost all credibiliy. Getting the name straight is the first step. Mozilla Firefox would be more like it.
Sorry Jack, but I have to disagree with your take on this one.
We all know that Firefox is not perfect and that it is not a panecea against exploits, but if there are currently just as many exploits against Firefox as there are against IE I wish this author had both quantified and qualified it. What I read here was not a careful analysis, but a Op-ed piece.
ReplyDeleteAs some of the comments on the article state, when he said Firefox's Mozilla the author lost all credibiliy. Getting the name straight is the first step. Mozilla Firefox would be more like it.
Sorry Jack, but I have to disagree with your take on this one.